Following weeks of numerous enquiries as to when the streets of Osterley and Spring Grove Ward would be liberated from weeds, Hounslow Highways sent me this list.
On checking the schedule, it was noted that a fair amount of roads and footpaths in the borough’s largest Ward were omitted so I shared this sheet with the missing third of locations and still await an update, hoping for the best.
About to take the Loukimousine to the football yesterday, I spotted a parking ticket under one of the wipers placed on the day the first side of the road got swept.
Yes, it has been paid; no councillor privilege expected nor sought. Rinsed as well as cleansed.
Would that the council’s parking contractor was as enthusiastic in enforcing the CPZs off the London Road School Streets Scheme during term time mornings and afternoons.
Councillors for Osterley and Spring Grove Ward have not stinted in their efforts to try to represent their residents nor to advocate for this, the largest and greenest in the whole of the London Borough of Hounslow. At all times when there have been pressures on our delicate environment in this part of Isleworth we have never neglected our responsibility to attend and advise at residents’ action planning meetings putting our people’s interests forward.
Since first revealed in May 2019 and before the debacle that was the rushed and badly choreographed Planning Committee of 8 April 2021, to Councillor Tony Louki’s recommending a petition and presentation of its 4,400 signatures to the Mayor of London at City Hall on 12 May 2021, attending, staying and participating at the demonstration outside the Recovery Conference at Holiday Inn Brentford on 22 July 2021 and the lobbying of the London Assembly on 2 September 2021, we have sought reviews and reconsideration of these ill thought, overblown, out of character and harmful schemes.
The councillors for Osterley and Spring Grove Ward, should like, for and to add to the record, the sharing of their letter to the minister who is in the uniquie position to call a halt and order a more humane proposal for this put upon part of the capital city.
Dear Secretary of State
Request to Call In – Homebase, Syon Lane [00505/H/P19] and Tesco, Syon Lane [01106/B/P137]
We are Councillors for Osterley and Spring Grove Ward in the London Borough of Hounslow and have arranged meetings, followed, pursued and worked with individual residents, residents’ associations and amenity groups since sponsors of the two developments publicly revealed their intentions in May 2019. By that time proposals appeared to have been well advanced with numerous pre planning discussions with senior staff and leadership at Hounslow Council alone and not communities.
In terms of public consultation, what followed, under the cloak of lockdown, was a series of scant and motherhood and apple pie letterbox brochures misrepresenting developer and council intentions. There were also mostly misleading social media surveys where results were never revealed at Planning Committee, mainly because the non phony responses vastly outweighed the bona fide and analytical from genuine respondents with locus.
The developer promised scale models but these were never delivered thus leaving it to the Osterley and Wyke Green Residents Association to spend its meagre resources on commissioning an accurate piece.
For those who have taken a close interest, those who properly know and represent local communities in this part of the borough, feel that they have seen no more than 0.00095% change in the proposal since the applicants’ delayed and shambolic Planning Presentation event in July 2020.
We have tried to comprehend the hurry to approve these schemes, particularly because these applications are the largest we have ever seen in such a relatively small geographical space, anywhere in the borough. But also, the developer and council jumped the gun before the ink on the draft revisions to the Hounslow Local Plan are hardly dry and, we believe, the Secretary of State has yet to appoint an Inspector to lead the public inquiry.
The virtual Planning Committee meeting on 8 April 2021 was rushed, premature and questionably chaired with comments made by officers presenting appearing, as many since described, as professionally compromised. The balance on presentations for and against the developments were one sided with no opportunity for opponents comment on officer explanations because these were not delivered at the outset. Neither the same with the applicant because they were allowed the last word without challenge. Ward Councillors were given five minutes each, totally inadequate on such large scheme proposals.
Like residents, Ward Councillors are not averse to development in this area but we do have numerous concerns with these two, naturally linked planning applications. We have serious questions and genuine worries about infrastructure, traffic, transport, housing heights, size, mix and design and felt that we made it clear but the long running ‘we need housing’ mantra at whatever cost prevailed for the misinformed and blinkered that night.
Transport and infrastructure are significant concerns for this site. We understand that it is within an ‘opportunity area’ and welcome some form of development but the balance in this situation is askew.
We know that Transport for London have assigned a Public Transport Accessibility Level rating of just above 1 in Osterley, compared to above 4 in Feltham and 6 in Hounslow. The planners’ report wrongly stated most of the site is at PTAL 2 and will at best after many unfunded and descoped projects be a 3. With regards to the vaunted West London Orbital, TfL has no money and this scheme featured in no election manifesto. The proposed Southall Link to Crossrail also has no money and the time frames set out are clearly pie in the sky. With such proposed density, we would not, in the least, regard this a sustainable development. The number of cycle spaces are all well and good but apart from fairly average tracks along the Great West Road, the road is not safe to cycle on through well used and already dangerous junctions with poor air quality to boot.
While the developers may talk about low level car parking for their sites, the sheer number of units combined with the poor PTAL will force occupiers to park in neighbouring streets impacting on existing residential amenity. It is neither acceptable nor correct that current residents should have to experience long hours controlled parking zones in a few years’ time because of poor planning today.
Reviewing the traffic studies, the report talks of much longer queues to access sites and the Great West Road than observed at present and suggests that the impact on the local road network may be significant. We cannot really call this a green recovery when greater congestion will happen if this scheme is approved, the responses from Hounslow Cycling seems to agree.
This is also one of many issues with the traffic element for the proposed replacement food store on the Homebase site and it is more than worth telling that TfL do not believe nor trust the developer on their suggested number of servicing trips for this site, leaving us with potentially illegal and dangerous on-street servicing of the store.
The developer speculates that Covid outcomes may reduce transport usage. TfL already predicts transport numbers to be in excess of the pre-Covid baseline in 2025; that this scheme, if approved, would start to occupy at that point yet the planners’ report to committee did not consider this modelling. Yet on the flip side, the significant increase in driving has not been adequately modelled
Our Ward currently has just over 13,400 residents, this combined, proposal will almost increase this by 50% without the required capacity to cope. The developments are too big, the equivalent of landing something with a population the size of Bagshot here in Isleworth.
Travelling by tube in a normal year from Osterley or indeed Boston Manor, commuters are familiar of waiting at the platform trying to board London bound Piccadilly Line train, with each one passing at full capacity. Now imagine that base line with an increase of 4,000 people trying to get on; similarly, travelling towards Waterloo from Syon Lane.
We accept some form of development at these sites however, we have not been presented with any idea of the infrastructure required to support these large scale developments. The developer cites the 15 minute neighbourhood without any proper nor researched evidence. Osterley tube 22 minutes away, Boston Manor 32, the nearest doctors 25-30, the nearest dentists 18 and these are all over subscribed.
In 2025 we would not honestly be able to tell our constituents why they cannot get a GP appointment or school place because this inadequate scheme was approved without the proper infrastructure. The planners’ report relies on the goodwill of the developer to provide a surgery at some point, something neither offered or guaranteed.
The developer proposes and planners accept the significant under provision in communal amenity space at the Homebase site of just at 4,928 sqm, significantly below the benchmark standard. This huge under provision is considered acceptable purely because of the need to fit in a supermarket. Too much in too small a place, to the detriment of future occupiers. 2,370sqm of play space should be provided for 240 children, yet just 500sqm less than that. To add further insult this is not proposed for on site. The developer considers it acceptable and planners agreeable to make up provision over half a mile away on the other side of the railway track, and into Brentford in the Leader of the Council, the lead member for Planning’s Ward.
We should also add that there has been absolutely and bizarrely no discussion with Osterley and Spring Grove Ward Councillors nor our residents on any amenity or suggestions for legally agreed community provisions arising out of these developments.
Even after the Hounslow Council and Mayor for London determinations, the report submitted still shows that this scheme is not right in its current form. The Secretary of State should insist that the developers and authorities have to make the time to go back and get it right, most people are now in the market for bigger units to allow for working or recreating from home. This proposed scheme was developed long before this shift in work life. To date Hounslow Council has not published verifiable data for housing need nor numbers of accepted homeless. The proposed high density at this location needs to be justified and balanced in the context of recent new builds and pipeline approvals elsewhere in the borough.
Public transport use at present is at a record low, and more people are driving, please send this back to the applicants and get them to truly engage with the community. The planning committee were urged to place a Grampian Condition, similar to other large development proposals such as at the Old Kent Road sites which cannot be fully built out until the Bakerloo Line extension starts, this was discussed by planning committee members because it was not commented upon by the council’s planners or traffic professionals.
In terms of gestation and the size of these schemes, these have seen less pre decision making exposure than the Ballymore Brentford Project which, in itself, is a bona fide regeneration plan, long in discussion and consultation. It is bigger than the Brentford Community Stadium scheme and its associated blocks but with fewer local facilities and impacting more established residential neighbourhoods. Drawings and ideas for this part of our Ward were shared with planners, council chief officers and council leadership a number of years ago but only came to light in 2019.
Despite Member consultations on the development of the Hounslow Local Plan Review where the consensus was no developments higher than six stories by established 1930s developments or more than 10 stories within the Great West Corridor proper. The final publication was a bulldozered draft unrecognisable from the expected outcome. This does not appear to be a new idea and a number of critics have suggested that the recently submitted Draft Local Plan for the Great West Corridor was tailored to help pave a path for this and similar applications. We would hope that, as a new Secretary of State, you will be your own man and agree with what many other ordinary folk do that very high buildings do not make for sustainable and peaceful communities.
It has been suggested the Community Infrastructure Levy will help pay for the services required to compensate for shortfall in transport, health and recreational provision over and above the meagre elements offered within the applications. This is nonsense.
At paragraph 11.5 of the Homebase site report, the CIL amounts quoted for are, £11.1m for Hounslow and £4.2m for London. Never, ever enough to pay for a safe, healthy and sustainable neighbourhoods. The second report quotes an estimated £21.2m for Hounslow and £9.3m for London for the current Tesco site but this will be piecemeal and not guaranteed.
How ever presented, these developments would be an adjunct to the Northumberland Estate, Syon Lane and Oaklands Avenue, not the eastwards facing Great West Corridor as, because of its largely residential nature, it has little in common with the rest the stretch to Chiswick Roundabout.
The published documents were not user friendly, perhaps a symptom of the rush to get them to committee although there is no explanation for this imperative apart from wanting to obfuscate. Each report contained at least 175 pages, none numbered, making it difficult for members of the Planning Committee to follow references. Paragraph 8 of the Homebase report had 501 sub paragraphs. There are numerous comments and objections from a number of parties from paragraph 6.5 onwards, all themed, but not grouped nor appear to have been or shown to be fully assessed. The report did no justice to the 830 residents individually writing in. There were no comments from the London Ambulance Service which uses Syon Lane to the Hospital nor, despite numerous requests, Hounslow Highways. There was complete disregard for the comments from Historic England and all other heritage organisations that took time and made effort to put their professional cases forward.
At paragraph 6.5, Transport for London maintained its reservations on both, but particularly the Homebase scheme. This was highlighted to the committee by objectors but not clarified by transport and planning officers on the night suggesting only one other blinkered imperative. The developer proposed cleaning the Gillette Corner Subway lights as an enhancement which is no substitute for pedestrian safety and convenience that residents and workers at Sky HQ have clamoured for safe surface crossings here for years.
The report at paragraph 8.163 appeared to brush aside Hounslow Council’s independent Design Review Panel’s assessment, critical of both, not least the Homebase scheme, even having looked at it twice.
They said to planners, “we are still certain that the footprint of Tesco is compromising your ability to provide public realm that is good enough in character or scale for this quantum of new housing. We would have liked to see a clearer vision for the two sites and commitment to delivering the at grade crossing, which is the first essential piece of the wider masterplan.” They maintained their concerns about limited and unmanageable amenity space and safety, particularly concerned with how potentially unsafe these cut throughs between blocks are likely to be.
The Design Review Panel also spotted the strange description of “semi dual aspect” flats, but half of dual is one, resulting in no through draught in a location where in summer it will get hot. More than 27% of the units on the Homebase site would have this feature; just one window on just one aspect, whichever way it’s looked at. The second aspect would be towards a solid brick wall.
We are very concerned about the existing 20 properties at Northumberland Gardens, opposite Homebase. Each maisonette will be overshadowed and each will have windows affected, all by at least 20% and some by as much as 40% and over. Along with limiting light to more than a quarter of potential new properties, the height and bulking of this development will darken the living rooms and bedrooms of our existing residents.
There could be alternative and more humane schemes to submit but these have not been considered by the applicant nor suggested or encouraged by Hounslow Council.
These developments are still not ready and if, as applied for, are not refused on grounds of non compliance with the current and operational National Planning Policy Framework, Local Plan, amenity, impact on neighbouring properties, inadequate and unguaranteed traffic and transport management; no direct contribution to rail improvements; lack of amenity and inadequate alternative space, then they should be.
Should the Secretary of State be mindful of approving these applications, very much preferably amended, in this very sensitive area more stringent conditions are required, not least in great need for bringing forward the Access Review before any further work is done.
Revisions sought would include,
No occupation of either site until the completion of public transport improvements and renewals in the Great West Corridor Opportunity Area. We ask that this is tied in to, 1 the Piccadilly Line upgrade, 2 the West London Orbital, 3 Great West Road bus improvements, 4 the Southall Rail Link. We believe that this will protect our current and future potential residents by ensuring the infrastructure is in place before development is built out.
Installation of TfL and Hounslow Highways junction works at Gillette Corner, Wood Lane, Busch Corner and Thornbury Road.
A Construction Plan which would not disturb residents on Northumberland Estate, Syon Lane, Wyke Estate and Great West Road.
A legal agreement to make an endowment fund of not less than £3m to support an independent Osterley Sports Network CIC, to develop and maintain sports and recreation in Osterley and Spring Grove Ward, significantly absent from these applications.
This development will impact the area like no other for decades to come. It has to be done right. There are too many clear indications that these developments are inappropriate by a large margin. Will the Secretary of State wish this on the local population?
As Ward Councillors, we are not against any development, but are against schemes that are not fit for the area or for the needs of the local residents. We should expect the best for our residents and the future occupiers of these homes. We should not settle for less, so how can we, you, agree to support a development in a location where the infrastructure is simply not there to achieve it?
Finally, we ask the Secretary of State whether he is 100% sure that as this development stands, it is appropriate? If there is any doubt, then we ask you to reject or defer these schemes until more suitable schemes are put forward.
Happy to have you over for a closer look, should you have the time.
Tony Louki, Unsa Chaudri and Richard Eason
Labour Party Councillors for Osterley and Spring Grove Ward
cc via email
Senior Planning Technical Officer
Planning Casework Unit
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
2 Rivergate, Temple Quay, Bristol, BS1 6EH
Senior Planning Manager
Planning Casework Unit
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
23 Stephenson Street, Birmingham, B2 4BH
Comments Off on Tesco Homebase: Ward Councillors’ Letter to Michael Gove
A couple of weeks ago when the Chair of Hounslow Council’s Labour Group released a statement on violence against residents in East Jerusalem, one correspondent on social media asked whether councillors didn’t have any local work to address.
A colleague, Councillor Salman Shaheenresponded with a whole rake of items that he had been working on for his residents. Salman’s retort prompted me to sincerely flatter the comrade from neighbouring Isleworth Ward.
I’m no David Frost, neither can I sing it like Millicent Martin let alone want to like Lance Percival, but here are some highlights from That Was The Week That Was from the currently longest serving councillor for Osterley and Spring Grove Ward. Fresh out of the 55th Mayoralty, allow me to explain.
A more than an occasional issue at the wee Tesco on Spring Grove Road where delivery cages take up pavement space for often beyond the visit of the big trucks. Particularly tiresome this time was the storing of these contraptions right up against one of the newly planted liquidambar styraciflua Worplesdon or Sweetgum trees. This was reported to Hounslow Highways for enforcement via Fix My Street and am assured that this will not happen again … .
The Thornbury, London and Spring Grove Roads Triangle had been a badly regulated domestic and fly tipping hotspot for a long time before 2014. Premises above shops were once accommodation for the family or staff running a business below but for many years the space has been sub divided and often short term tenanted. This creates problems for household waste storage leading to outdoor mess. The council’s recycling and waste team issue purple bags for waste from flats above shops and have placed a number of coffers at close proximity for their containment until twice weekly removal. An improvement but mainly black bags still get dumped on pavements, added to by casual or opportunistic fly tippers; I always report this stuff to Hounslow Highways for removal via Fix My Street. Occasional placement of cctv cameras does help identify perpetrators who are pursued and fined by the council.
Visited Our Barn at Jubilee Lodge in Osterley Park to drop of some items commissioned for them to sell on behalf of the two charities (Our Barn and Hounslow Seniors Trust) chosen to profile and fundraise for when I was the 55th Mayor. Their garden is looking lovely because members of the community have been busy maintaining it throughout and I got given rhubarb that day.
Following an earlier shout, was at Oaklands Avenue, within the Osterley Park Conservation Area. Calling on neighbours either side who are concerned that improvement works next door had dragged for more than two years and not entirely as permitted. The additional impacts of having an empty and unfinished house close by including rodent attraction, disconnected drainage and other fails in the property were getting them down. A member of the council’s planning enforcement team is pursuing the owner to regularise and is already communicating with residents.
On Syon Lane with contractors, Hounslow Council and Hounslow Highways back in December 2020, I noted that a pedestrian crossing included as a traffic condition for the Bolder Academy planning permission was missing and suggesting that it was dropped. No way Joseph! Happy that it was added in April for safe pedestrian access although it seems that the solar powered Belisha beacons require sunshine, reported but with the proviso that no trees are damaged in order to facilitate.
I was the guest speaker at the annual general meeting Osterley and Wyke Green Residents Association talking about my time as the rollover Mayor of the London Borough of Hounslow. Tales of two years, some of the 340 events attended, 13 Borough Council meetings chaired, two Remembrance Sundays each at 10 war memorials, still making time to do casework and to try to represent my residents. It was also a good reminder of the longevity of OWGRA with which I first developed a relationship during earlier planning events on the then United Biscuits site as well as working together on nonsense ambitions for other land in the Ward.
A flurry of discourse on a social media site that will not be named resulted in a few visits and chats with residents the previous week with copious amounts of pictures taken, reports made to Hounslow Highways via Fix My Street and emails to the Director of Environmental Services. The director, Mr Wayne Stephenson, already familiar with the issues rendezvoused for a whistle stop to locations from the Northumberland to Thornbury Road.
We met at Albury Avenue and on behalf of colleague Councillor Unsa Chaudri, who is currently engaged with residents on the state of pavements there. The footways, a victim of pavement parking but moreso HGVs and skip lorries delivering on this narrow crescent these past 30+ years, will be focussed on as a result.
A drive in my motor via College Road to show Mr Stephenson the loss of integrity of half its 1992 vintage speed tables since a new road coating a couple of years ago; raised by a resident who scientifically measured and compared the differences. On the ones affected by resurfacing, the current and previous speed limits were easily busted, the matter is, therefore, still live.
On to Borough Road where the previous week, more pictures of marked and unmarked road and pavement defects had been submitted after residents had been in touch. I had visited in response to folk writing, some had been fixed but wanted to show the general state before a proper response from council officers managing the Hounslow Highways contract.
Quick visits over at Thornbury Avenue and The Grove to look at other surfaces reported and then to Weston Gardens, a cul de sac with a dozen properties and equal number of defects. I had found with St Mary’s Crescent that the more a road’s potholes are reported and fixed, the further down the list a road goes for complete resurfacing; done now but it took five years since the first promise. I introduced Wayne Stephenson to my resident contact there and agreed that while the space currently appears messy, Weston Gardens is very likely to get the full treatment soon, what little pavement and carriageway it actually has.
Our last stop was at Banksian Walk, part of the former carriageway to Spring Grove House, nicely planted with an avenue of yews but currently suffering ivy creep over neighbouring boundaries and the resident had been in touch. Mr S agreed, more pictures taken and submitted with a service request to Hounslow Highways to manage the landscape plus one other to remove some graffiti on the wall there.
Sidmouth Avenue and Crawford Close, near where Thornbury Park meets the railway and a neighbourhood that has sought council support for their projects and ambitions since 2014; residents, naturally, receive my assistance. Excepting 2020, Saturday’s was the sixth annual neighbourhood tidy up and in seven years we’ve gone from a beyond brim skip to just 15 or so sacks of picked including from beyond these two roads, no longer any long term fly tips.
On the way home via Kilberry Close to check, on Councillor Chaudri’s behalf, the occasionally abused estate based recycling facility there where the council’s Recycling and Enforcement Teams have been making efforts to “educate” and “encourage” residents and managing agents alike. It’s Unsa’s case so I took pictures for her to share with the council teams.
Tuesday 25 May 2021
There. Done for now. Plenty more not to bore readers with but will be back with TW3.02 before too long. I will, naturally, welcome comments from Osterley and Spring Grove residents.
The conversion of the former Dudley House Nursing Home to 17 flats appears to be nearing completion following approval at the Hounslow Council Planning Committee of 9 March 2017 and conclusion of a planning agreement in August 2018.
Condition 13 of the planning permission granted allows for 9 car parking spaces, including one for people with disabilities and 30 cycle parking spaces plus a restriction of any resident of the development obtaining a parking permit within the controlled parking zone. Parking is covered in paragraphs 7.39 to 7.43 of the 9.3.2017 committee report, linked below).
The developer has recently submitted a planning application seeking to revise Condition 13 and this is currently under consideration by Hounslow Council’s planners.
Links to referred documents may be found with appropriate clicking:
I hope you don’t mind my writing to you, just a few hours before the polls open but it has been a hectic few days and I am a little behind, a bit of casework outstanding too.
I think that we have been in touch before either via Councillor casework, a meeting I have held to discuss one of the planning applications, the London Road, our train stations or a traffic matter; along with others, you may have petitioned me. I might have knocked on your door whilst out campaigning or checking on local issues with Ruth Cadbury MP. You may have seen what I do or found out what interests me from my Tweets or read the odd item here on my sometimes neglected website.
Moving to Isleworth the day after the storm of October 1987. Linkfield, Parkwood and now living on London Road. I did a couple of stints as councillor for Isleworth North in the 1990s, battling Tesco and the Earl over their development ambitions even doing the same with my then council comrades and our Chief Executive, the then plain Bob Kerslake, over the rebuilding of Marlborough School. As a councillor since, I have met many of you and worked in all neighbourhoods to address residents’ issues and concerns; have even caught up with some old faces from back in the day.
It has be a great pleasure to have been your, the only, Labour Councillor for Osterley and Spring Grove Ward, these past four years. Not only have I tried to represent the largest and still greenest ward in Hounslow but I have succeeded, I think, in bringing people together to work on interests common in their neighbourhoods.
March 2017: Crawford Sidmouth Clean Up III
One of my proudest is, after having been invited to join a local environmental clean up in October 2014, was to support and encourage the residents of Crawford Close and Sidmouth Avenue in an ambition to pave and light a muddy but well used route to Isleworth Station. Three years and two clean ups later, works have started and a proper residents association has taken off. Funds for this came from the section 106 developer money I jad bid for.
Thornbury Park, Isleworth
Another success is, after many years of disinterest by the previous, Conservative, councillors, we have begun to improve Thornbury Park with the support of an enthusiastic Friends Group not to mention £80,000 of funds secured from the council. In 2015, the same amount was accessed for long overdue improvements to Jersey Gardens and the end result was the award of its Green Flag last year.
Another early achievement was to set up the Osterley Sports Network where I brought together Osterley and Spring Grove’s numerous sports clubs and grounds, schools, council and external funders to work together to promote their facilities, healthy pursuits and memberships.
January 2016: Former Borough Road College lighting not serviced for 10+ years until I was approached by residents for support and a long search to find out who should fix (was not LBH)
I could also go into detail about the number of flytips I have seen and reported, potholes I’ve requested to be fixed, graffiti removed, abandoned vehicles taken away and the rest of the environmental atrocities but this is bread and butter stuff. I would prefer, and I have encouraged, residents to do so their selves.
The reason I highlight these few accomplishments is that after over 25 years of Conservative councillors here in Osterley and Spring Grove, I have started to reverse their possibly preferred neglect of our neighbourhoods. I say that because it is easy to ignore and, not report and let any mess prevail in order to blame the rival political party in power. That way, when it’s election time, all you have to do is accuse carelessness in order to get the votes.
May 2014: Neglected Jersey Gardens space left after gate stolen at St Mary’s Crescent now fixed following my bid for resources
That modus operandi does not and should not work anymore. You get elected, you embrace the role, you see something broken so do your best to fix it or refer it to someone who can. No denying, Osterley and Spring Grove Ward, is improved and better cohesive because the people here have had a working and commited Labour councillor with no hidden agenda.
Former Telephone Repeater building on footpath to Osterley Station: owner pursued and fined under the Proceeds of Crime Act. Recently cleared of “squatters” following continued Hounslow Council enforcement.
From day one, I picked up and resolved long term issues that previous Conservative councillors either ignored or didn’t (and still don’t) follow through on, such as,
prosecution of the owner of the troublesome illegal dwelling on Spencer Road footpath
clearing and fencing of the Earl of Jersey’s notorious dump on Braybourne Drive
removal of trade waste bins from Clifton Road and a clean up behind the London Road shops, making this almost flytip free
securing cash to create safe routes and access to Isleworth and Syon Lane Stations
chasing Hounslow Highways and successfully reducing its backlog of repairs across the ward.
January 2015: Bins at Clifton Road
In short, I have worked hard with residents, the council, police and other local partners to reverse Conservative neglect and disinterest to make sure we have a ward we can all be proud of. I want to continue this, and I hope to do so with two more Labour councillors who can support us with this goal.
This is what I have been doing since May 2014 and should like to do it again but with a full team of doers, alongside Labour Party candidates Unsa Chaudri and Richard Eason. These two are energetic, enthusiastic, bright and waiting to get started. I would even go as far to say that they are twice as good as me.
Tony Louki, Richard Eason and Unsa Chaudri at Spencer Road recently
You have a choice to make. You will decide who will be your Osterley and Spring Grove ward councillors for the next four years. You can vote for three Labour councillors who will be hardworking and committed to ensuring that your voice is heard in the council.
Unsa works in developing community services in local government, as a previous candidate in Osterley and Spring Grove, she brings a wealth of experience working within the local community. Unsa serves as a governor for two local schools.
Richard is an experienced finance and projects professional who has spent the past decade championing community and voluntary sector activity and involvement.
Nationally, the headlines each day show just how big a mess the Conservatives are making in Government and their only ambition is to save their own positions.
Locally, Labour are getting on with running the Council, making steady improvements despite huge cuts in funding from the Government. The contrast between us could not be more stark.
The developer of new homes on London Road agreed to my request that the location be called Samuelson Place after the founder of Worton Studios and the blocks after directors who filmed there
With your support, Labour will continue to invest in improving services for residents. I’ve been working hard to do just that for the past four years. Unlike the two Conservatives I have just shared my term with, I bid for, and won, an additional £470,000 cash for the ward, for its parks, for improving amenity areas, for heritage, including the area’s film legacy, and for the Borough Road War Memorial. With a full team of three Labour councillors in Osterley and Spring Grove we would do so much more.
Osterley Library opened by past Labour strongman Alf King 52 years ago. Still operating despite the almost ritual quadrennial scaring and government austerity funding cuts
We will be able to,
continue the work begun to improve our parks and playgrounds
maintain Osterley Library, it will stay open, the Conservatives’ closure scares is a 30 year old broken record they have played at the last 8 council elections
work with and promote our local sports facilities
maintain pressure on Transport for London to improve the condition of the Great West Road, its pavements, cycle lanes and make safe the junctions at Gillette Corner, Wood Lane and Thornbury Road
keep pressing South Western Railway to improve the trains service and stations at Isleworth and Syon Lane.
Jan 2018: With OSG Dedicated Ward Officer PC Carl Scully noting another find of spent nitrous oxide charges
We will always support and campaign for more police; there were six looking after us here in 2014, now we’re down to just three officers; sadly, the Met has suffered swingeing austerity cuts too.
This election is important, in 2014 residents took a chance on me and I do not think I have let you down.
Tomorrow, I hope you will, even if you have never supported Labour before, lendyour three votes to support my team, so we can fully maximise the service our neighbourhoods get from Hounslow’s Labour Council. If by 2022, we have let you and the Ward down, you can have them back but as many have been saying about me, so far so good.
Labour Party Councillor for Osterley and Spring Grove Ward
Vote from 7.00 am to 10.00 pm and if you have not yet completed your postal vote, please do so and deliver it to any of the polling stations in the London Borough of Hounslow.
Hounslow’s votes will be counted at Hounslow Civic Centre from 10.00 am on Friday
Comments Off on A letter to my constituents: 4 years in and still so much to do
Hounslow's streets and street services are having a major make-over. If you have problems or questions concerning any aspect of this work then please contact <a href="https://fms.hounslowhighways.org/.